Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе:
https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10338
Nаziv: | Interventions to control Salmonella contamination during poultry, cattle and pig slaughter | Аutоri: | Bunčić, Sonja Sofos J. |
Dаtum izdаvаnjа: | 1-мар-2012 | Čаsоpis: | Food Research International | Sažetak: | The fundamental principle of controlling microbial contamination during slaughter is based on sanitary and hygienic processes. Both choosing abattoir technologies and conducting individual operations should be approached with the primary goal of minimizing microbial load on the final product. Nevertheless, even when best hygienic abattoir practices are applied, complete prevention of all microbial contamination of carcasses is unachievable under commercial conditions. Therefore, in some situations it may be considered necessary to further reduce the microbial loads on carcasses through application of additional control interventions, i.e. decontamination treatments. Treatments applied on poultry carcasses or parts include water, steam and chemical solutions (e.g., lactic or acetic acid, chlorine-based compounds, cetylpyridinium chloride, and trisodium phosphate) and result in overall microbial reductions of 0.6-3.8 log units; antimicrobial activity of some chemicals (e.g., chlorine compounds) is reduced in the presence of organic material. Decontamination treatments of hides (pre-skinning) and/or cattle carcasses reduce Salmonella by < 0.7-5.1 log units. Salmonella prevalence reductions achievable by decontamination of porcine carcasses seem to be at least two-fold. Overall Salmonella reductions on final carcasses and meat can be significantly improved when multiple decontamination treatments are applied sequentially during slaughter and dressing operations. It is important to note that decontamination interventions should be validated and considered as part of a hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP)-based food safety system which is subject to verification and auditing, and they should never be used as a substitute for good sanitation and proper hygiene practices. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. | URI: | https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10338 | ISSN: | 9639969 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.10.018 |
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа: | FTN Publikacije/Publications |
Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki
SCOPUSTM
Nаvоđеnjа
107
prоvеrеnо 20.11.2023.
Prеglеd/i stаnicа
21
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
1
1
Prоtеkli mеsеc
0
0
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.
Google ScholarTM
Prоvеritе
Аlt mеtrikа
Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.