Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10338
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBunčić, Sonjaen
dc.contributor.authorSofos J.en
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-03T14:38:57Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-03T14:38:57Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-01en
dc.identifier.issn9639969en
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10338-
dc.description.abstractThe fundamental principle of controlling microbial contamination during slaughter is based on sanitary and hygienic processes. Both choosing abattoir technologies and conducting individual operations should be approached with the primary goal of minimizing microbial load on the final product. Nevertheless, even when best hygienic abattoir practices are applied, complete prevention of all microbial contamination of carcasses is unachievable under commercial conditions. Therefore, in some situations it may be considered necessary to further reduce the microbial loads on carcasses through application of additional control interventions, i.e. decontamination treatments. Treatments applied on poultry carcasses or parts include water, steam and chemical solutions (e.g., lactic or acetic acid, chlorine-based compounds, cetylpyridinium chloride, and trisodium phosphate) and result in overall microbial reductions of 0.6-3.8 log units; antimicrobial activity of some chemicals (e.g., chlorine compounds) is reduced in the presence of organic material. Decontamination treatments of hides (pre-skinning) and/or cattle carcasses reduce Salmonella by < 0.7-5.1 log units. Salmonella prevalence reductions achievable by decontamination of porcine carcasses seem to be at least two-fold. Overall Salmonella reductions on final carcasses and meat can be significantly improved when multiple decontamination treatments are applied sequentially during slaughter and dressing operations. It is important to note that decontamination interventions should be validated and considered as part of a hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP)-based food safety system which is subject to verification and auditing, and they should never be used as a substitute for good sanitation and proper hygiene practices. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.en
dc.relation.ispartofFood Research Internationalen
dc.titleInterventions to control Salmonella contamination during poultry, cattle and pig slaughteren
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foodres.2011.10.018en
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84857409509en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84857409509en
dc.relation.lastpage655en
dc.relation.firstpage641en
dc.relation.issue2en
dc.relation.volume45en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFakultet tehničkih nauka, Departman za industrijsko inženjerstvo i menadžment-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultet tehničkih nauka-
Appears in Collections:FTN Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

107
checked on Nov 20, 2023

Page view(s)

21
Last Week
1
Last month
0
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.