Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/9240
Nаziv: Determination of surface roughness and topography of dental resin-based nanocomposites using AFM analysis
Аutоri: Tijana Lainović 
Marko Vilotić 
Larisa Blažić 
Damir Kakaš
Dubravka Marković 
Aljoša Ivanišević
Ključnе rеči: dental polishing and finishing;Composite resin;nanocomposite;nanoparticles;Atomic force microscopy;Surface roughness;topography
Dаtum izdаvаnjа: 1-јан-2013
Čаsоpis: Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences
Sažetak: The aim of this study was to determine surface roughness and topography of polished dental resin-based nanocomposites. Four representative dental resin-based nanocomposites were tested in the study: two nanohybrids (Filtek Z550 and Tetric EvoCeram) and two nanofilled (Filtek Ultimate Body and Filtek Ultimate Translucent); and two reference materials: one microfilled (Gradia Direct) and one microhybrid (Filtek Z250). Polymerized cylindrical specimens (4 mm x 2 mm) were polished with multi-step polishing system- Super Snap. Immediately after the polishing, topography of each specimen was examined by Veeco di CP-II Atomic Force Microscope. Specimen's surface has been scanned in 6 points in contact mode with CONT20A-CP tips. 1 Hz scan rate and 256 × 256 resolution were used to obtain topography on a 90 μm × 90 μm scanning area. Measured topography data were processed by Image Processing and Data Analysis v2.1.15 software. Following parameters were compared among specimens: average roughness and maximum peak-to-valley distance. All of the tested materials had similar average surface roughness after finishing and polishing procedure. The lowest values occurred in the material Filtek Ultimate Body, and the highest in the Filtek Z550. When interpreting maximum peak-to-valley distance the larger differences in values (up to 100%) occurred in Filtek Z550, Filtek Z250 and Filtek Ultimate Body, which is a result of the deep polishing channels and tracks. Type, size, distribution of fillers and filler loading in tested materials, didn't infl uence average roughness values, but had an impact on maximum peak-to-valley distance values. © 2013 Association of Basic Medical Sciences of FBIH. All rights reserved.
URI: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/9240
ISSN: 15128601
DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2013.2417
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:FTN Publikacije/Publications

Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

20
prоvеrеnо 26.08.2020.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

30
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
8
Prоtеkli mеsеc
2
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.