Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1257
Title: Secondary lymphedema of the arm, the perception of the disease, self-efficacy and depression as determinants of quality of life in patients with breast cancer
Authors: Svetlana Popović Petrović 
Aleksandra Kovač 
Nataša Kovač
Snežana Tovilović 
Ivana Novakov
Ćulibrk, Dragan
Keywords: breast neoplasms;upper extremity;lymphedema;quality of life;perception;depression
Issue Date: 1-Oct-2018
Journal: Vojnosanitetski Pregled
Abstract: © 2018, Routledge. All rights reserved. Background/Aim. Secondary lymphedema of the arm is one of possible side-effects and complications of breast cancer and its treatment which can contribute and precipitate to a number of new psychosocial problems. The aim of this study was to examine the differences in quality of life of patients suffering from breast cancer, with arm lymphedema and those without lymphedema, and to determine the significance of the perception of the disease, depressive symptoms and self-efficacy contribution to overall quality of life. Methods. The research was designed as a cross-sectional study, which included 64 patients -34 with arm lymphedema and 30 without lymphedema. Questionnaire FACT-B + 4 was applied to assess the quality of life, BIPQ for the perception of the disease, depression was measured by DASS-21 scale, while self-efficacy was tested by SGSE scale. T-test, Mann Whitney U Test, χ2 test and hierarchical regression analysis were applied to data processing. Results. There was not any significant difference between the groups in the total score of quality of life (t = 0.469, p > 0.05), or in the individual subscales: physical well-being (t = 0.535, p > 0.05), social/family well-being (t = 1.43, p > 0.05), emotional well-being (t = 1.35, p > 0.05), functional well-being (z = -0.243, p > 0.05), breast cancer scale (t = -0.839, p > 0.05) and arm scale (t = -0.514, p >0.05), while the perception of the disease (β = -0.603, t = -5.958, p < 0.001) and depression (β = -0.411, t = -4.101, p < 0.001) proved to be significant predictors of quality of life and explain 50.2% variance of overall quality of life. Conclusion. The results of our study indicate the importance of a comprehensive rehabilitation program, directed both at functional and psychosocial aspects.
URI: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1257
ISSN: 00428450
DOI: 10.2298/VSP160613006P
Appears in Collections:FF Publikacije/Publications

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on May 6, 2023

Page view(s)

30
Last Week
8
Last month
0
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.