Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1257
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSvetlana Popović Petrovićen_US
dc.contributor.authorAleksandra Kovačen_US
dc.contributor.authorNataša Kovačen_US
dc.contributor.authorSnežana Tovilovićen_US
dc.contributor.authorIvana Novakoven_US
dc.contributor.authorĆulibrk, Draganen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T10:14:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T10:14:31Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-01-
dc.identifier.issn00428450en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1257-
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Routledge. All rights reserved. Background/Aim. Secondary lymphedema of the arm is one of possible side-effects and complications of breast cancer and its treatment which can contribute and precipitate to a number of new psychosocial problems. The aim of this study was to examine the differences in quality of life of patients suffering from breast cancer, with arm lymphedema and those without lymphedema, and to determine the significance of the perception of the disease, depressive symptoms and self-efficacy contribution to overall quality of life. Methods. The research was designed as a cross-sectional study, which included 64 patients -34 with arm lymphedema and 30 without lymphedema. Questionnaire FACT-B + 4 was applied to assess the quality of life, BIPQ for the perception of the disease, depression was measured by DASS-21 scale, while self-efficacy was tested by SGSE scale. T-test, Mann Whitney U Test, χ2 test and hierarchical regression analysis were applied to data processing. Results. There was not any significant difference between the groups in the total score of quality of life (t = 0.469, p > 0.05), or in the individual subscales: physical well-being (t = 0.535, p > 0.05), social/family well-being (t = 1.43, p > 0.05), emotional well-being (t = 1.35, p > 0.05), functional well-being (z = -0.243, p > 0.05), breast cancer scale (t = -0.839, p > 0.05) and arm scale (t = -0.514, p >0.05), while the perception of the disease (β = -0.603, t = -5.958, p < 0.001) and depression (β = -0.411, t = -4.101, p < 0.001) proved to be significant predictors of quality of life and explain 50.2% variance of overall quality of life. Conclusion. The results of our study indicate the importance of a comprehensive rehabilitation program, directed both at functional and psychosocial aspects.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofVojnosanitetski Pregleden_US
dc.subjectbreast neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectupper extremityen_US
dc.subjectlymphedemaen_US
dc.subjectquality of lifeen_US
dc.subjectperceptionen_US
dc.subjectdepressionen_US
dc.titleSecondary lymphedema of the arm, the perception of the disease, self-efficacy and depression as determinants of quality of life in patients with breast canceren_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/VSP160613006P-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85060084797-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85060084797-
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.relation.lastpage967en_US
dc.relation.firstpage961en_US
dc.relation.issue10en_US
dc.relation.volume75en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptMedicinski fakultet, Katedra za onkologiju-
crisitem.author.deptMedicinski fakultet-
crisitem.author.deptFilozofski fakultet, Odsek za psihologiju-
crisitem.author.parentorgMedicinski fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniverzitet u Novom Sadu-
crisitem.author.parentorgFilozofski fakultet-
Appears in Collections:FF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on May 6, 2023

Page view(s)

30
Last Week
8
Last month
0
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.