Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8529
Nаziv: The research, integration and utilization (RIU) model as an analytical framework for the professionalization of departmental research organizations: Case studies of publicly funded forest research institutes in Serbia and Croatia
Аutоri: Stevanov, Mirjana 
Böcher M.
Krott M.
Krajter S.
Vuletic D.
Orlović, Saša 
Dаtum izdаvаnjа: 1-дец-2013
Čаsоpis: Forest Policy and Economics
Sažetak: Policy-makers articulate a growing need for science-based policy advice that supports their decisions, especially in fields that are dependent on scientific knowledge like natural resources or forestry. Publicly funded organizations, such as departmental research institutes, have been established in many countries to provide science-based policy advice. To assess the activities of two public research institutes, namely, Serbia's Institute of Lowland Forestry and Environment (ILFE) and the Croatian Forest Research Institute (CFI), we use the new theory-based analytical model of departmental research developed by Böcher and Krott (2010). This model describes scientific policy advice as the connection between Research (R), Integration (I), and Utilization (U) - the RIU-model. Primary and secondary evidence refer to 148 ILFE and CFI projects conducted from 2005 to 2010. Our critical analysis of empirical data, which were collected through semi-structured face-to-face interviews and project documentation, shows the following: (i) it is possible to analyze all activities of the two research institutes with the RIU-model of departmental research and present the results using "production lines"; (ii) activities of ILFE and CFI can be presented by the same types of production lines revealing their similar profile; (iii) all three spheres of the RIU-model can be found in the successful ILFE and CFI projects, only the Integration sphere is found in all projects; and (iv) the RIU-model is able to describe comprehensive activities of both research institutes, which opens the possibility to improve current evaluation procedures by taking into account both practical and scientific activities and outputs. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
URI: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8529
ISSN: 13899341
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.03.006
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:ILFE Publikacije/Publications

Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

34
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

21
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
6
Prоtеkli mеsеc
0
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.