Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3919
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRajković, Maricaen
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T10:30:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T10:30:54Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en
dc.identifier.issn18200958en
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3919-
dc.description.abstractThe author analyzes the extent to which Schiller's thematisation of poietic phenomena can be seen as aesthetics, and in which as philosophy of art. This question actually examines the fundus of Schiller philosophy, because it considers whether it is closer to Kant or it represents important source for the separation of Kant, carried out by Fichte, Schelling and Hegel. Kant's influence to Schiller's philosophical concept is visible in the field of aesthetics, while Schiller's influence to Schelling and Hegel can be seenin founding of the philosophy of art. In this way, the aesthetic prism shows the scheme through which the whole philosophy of German idealism moves from Kant to Hegel, ie - develops from the subjective to the absolute idealism.en
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Philosophy ARHEen
dc.titleSchiller: Aesthetics and philosophy of arten
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85019562357en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85019562357en
dc.relation.lastpage78en
dc.relation.firstpage57en
dc.relation.issue26en
dc.relation.volume13en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFilozofski fakultet, Odsek za filozofiju-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0901-4102-
crisitem.author.parentorgFilozofski fakultet-
Appears in Collections:FF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

25
Last Week
10
Last month
0
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.