Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2985
Pоljе DC-аVrеdnоstЈеzik
dc.contributor.authorTot, Bojanaen
dc.contributor.authorVujić, Goranen
dc.contributor.authorSrđević, Zoricaen
dc.contributor.authorUbavin, Dejanen
dc.contributor.authorRusso M.en
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T10:25:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T10:25:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-01en
dc.identifier.issn0734242Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2985-
dc.description.abstract© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. Decision makers in developing countries are struggling to solve the present problems of solid waste management. Prioritisation and ranking of the most important indicators that influence the waste management system is very useful for any decision maker for the future planning and implementation of a sustainable waste management system. The aim of this study is to evaluate key indicators and their related sub-indicators in a group decision-making environment. In order to gain insight into the subject it was necessary to obtain the qualified opinions of decision makers from different countries who understand the situation in the sector of waste management in developing countries. An assessment is performed by 43 decision makers from both developed and developing countries, and the applied methodology is based on a combined use of the analytic hierarchy process, from the multi-criteria decision-making set of tools, and the preferential voting method known as Borda Count, which belongs to social choice theory. Pairwise comparison of indicators is performed with the analytic hierarchy process, and the ranking of indicators once obtained is assessed with Borda Count. Detailed analysis of the final results showed that the Institutional–Administrative indicator was the most important one, with the maximum weight as derived by both groups of decision makers. The results also showed that the combined use of the analytic hierarchy process and Borda Count contributes to the credibility and objectivity of the decision-making process, allowing its use in more complex waste management group decision-making problems to be recommended.en
dc.relation.ispartofWaste Management and Researchen
dc.titleGroup assessment of key indicators of sustainable waste management in developing countriesen
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0734242X17709911en
dc.identifier.pmid35en
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85027453458en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85027453458en
dc.relation.lastpage922en
dc.relation.firstpage913en
dc.relation.issue9en
dc.relation.volume35en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartman za inženjerstvo zaštite životne sredine i zaštite na radu-
crisitem.author.deptDepartman za inženjerstvo zaštite životne sredine i zaštite na radu-
crisitem.author.deptDepartman za uređenje voda-
crisitem.author.deptDepartman za inženjerstvo zaštite životne sredine i zaštite na radu-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1034-9540-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultet tehničkih nauka-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultet tehničkih nauka-
crisitem.author.parentorgPoljoprivredni fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultet tehničkih nauka-
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:FTN Publikacije/Publications
Prikаzаti јеdnоstаvаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

5
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

32
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
11
Prоtеkli mеsеc
4
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.