Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/28438
Nаziv: Evaluating the necessity for thermal treatment in clay-based metal immobilization techniques as an environmentally acceptable sediment remediation process
Аutоri: Krčmar Dejan 
Dalmacija Milena
Prica Miljana 
Tričković Jelena 
Karlović Elvira
Dalmacija Božo 
Dаtum izdаvаnjа: 2013
Čаsоpis: Journal of Soils and Sediments
Sažetak: Purpose: The objective of this research was to apply the same immobilization (stabilization/solidification) clay-based treatments to sediment contaminated with different metals (Pb, Cd, Ni, Zn, Cu, Cr) with different distributions and availabilities in sediment. We also examined the possibility of using clay as an immobilization agent without the application of thermal treatment, in order to reduce the economic cost of this expensive remediation procedure. Materials and methods: Clay from a canal in Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia, was used as the immobilization agent in a stabilization/solidification treatment to remediate metal-contaminated sediment. Semi-dynamic and toxicity characteristic leaching tests were conducted to assess the effectiveness of the nonthermal and thermal immobilization treatments with clay, and the long-term leaching behavior of these metals was determined using the following parameters: cumulative percentage of metals leached; diffusion coefficients; leachability indices; and toxicity characteristic leaching test concentration. Results and discussion: Based on these parameters, both clay-based treatments were effective in immobilizing metals in the contaminated sediment. Results suggest that both heating temperature and clay proportion in the sediment-clay mixture impact the degree of metal immobilization. Conclusions: Clay-based products are potentially good immobilization materials for metal-contaminated sediments, with the distribution of metals in the original sediment not influencing the efficacy of the treatments. Even without the thermal treatment, the metals were effectively immobilized. The leaching of metals was largely inside the regulatory limits and the treated samples can be regarded as nonhazardous materials. This justifies the choice of not applying the more expensive thermal treatment during remediation, especially when treating sediments containing a mixture of pollutants. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
URI: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/28438
ISSN: 1439-0108
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-013-0722-2
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:PMF Publikacije/Publications

Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

4
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

23
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
2
Prоtеkli mеsеc
2
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.