Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2267
Pоljе DC-аVrеdnоstЈеzik
dc.contributor.authorLazovic B.en
dc.contributor.authorZlatkovic-Svenda M.en
dc.contributor.authorGrbovic J.en
dc.contributor.authorMilenković B.en
dc.contributor.authorSipetic-Grujicic S.en
dc.contributor.authorKopitović, Ivanen
dc.contributor.authorŽugić, Višnjaen
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T10:20:34Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T10:20:34Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2267-
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia Background: The influence of exercise on the pulmonary function is controverse, some studies have reported no sports influence, while the others have found positive correlation. Aim: To evaluate and compare the sports influence on pulmonary function: spirometry (VC, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC), lung diffusing capacity (DLCO) and coefficient of the CO gas transfer (KCO) in two elite athletes groups and healthy sedentary controls. Method: Equally divided into aerobic and anaerobic group, 60 elite athletes were recruited, as well as 43 age-matched, healthy sedentary controls. All of the participants performed basic anthropometric measurements, spirometry, DLCO and KCO at rest. Kruskal–Wallis one way ANOVA test was used to determine differences between groups; Mann–Whitney U test was used for inter-groups differences and Pearson coefficient for pulmonary variables and anthropometric parameters correlation. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS computer statistic program, version 20. Results: No differences were found in pulmonary characteristics (spirometric function values, DLCO and KCO) in athletes and non-athletes at rest, as well as between aerobics and anaerobics. There were no correlations between the anthropometric parameters and the investigated respiratory function tests. DLCO (%) correlated positively with height in athletes playing anaerobic type of sport (karate and taekwondo) (p = 0.036; r = 0.544), and negatively in sedentary control group (p = 0.030; r = −0.560). Regarding KCO, no differences were found. Conclusion: Spirometry indices and DLCO are not influenced either by aerobic or anaerobic training type, so benefits of sports on pulmonary indices or DLCO was not confirmed.en
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)en
dc.titleComparison of lung diffusing capacity in young elite athletes and their counterpartsen
dc.typeundefineden
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.09.006en
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85044951481en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85044951481en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptKatedra za internu medicinu-
crisitem.author.deptDepartman za arhitekturu i urbanizam-
crisitem.author.parentorgMedicinski fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgFakultet tehničkih nauka-
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:FTN Publikacije/Publications
Prikаzаti јеdnоstаvаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

1
prоvеrеnо 20.05.2023.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

39
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
3
Prоtеkli mеsеc
0
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.