Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе:
https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1929
Nаziv: | Institutionalist versus neoclassical view on income distribution and economic progress: The OECD panel evidence | Аutоri: | Josifidis K. Supić, Novica |
Dаtum izdаvаnjа: | 1-јан-2018 | Čаsоpis: | Panoeconomicus | Sažetak: | © 2018, Savez Ekonomista Vojvodine. All rights reserved. Institutionalist and neoclassical views on income distribution are characterized by different assumptions about the inequality-savings-economic progress relationship. By questioning the neoclassical arguments, the paper promotes the attitude that economic progress results not from savings as “abstain from current consumption” but from society’s ability to continuously develop technological arts and crafts. Empirical analysis of panel data from OECD countries using a dynamic GMM model shows a positive relationship between income concentration and aggregate savings, but there is no robust evidence of a positive relationship between aggregate savings and economic progress. Furthermore, we find robust evidence that technology and human capital are the key determinants of economic progress, implying that accumulation of physical and human capital is more important for economic progress than accumulation of financial capital. | URI: | https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1929 | ISSN: | 1452595X | DOI: | 10.2298/PAN1803319J |
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа: | EF Publikacije/Publications |
Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki
SCOPUSTM
Nаvоđеnjа
6
prоvеrеnо 20.11.2023.
Prеglеd/i stаnicа
27
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
1
1
Prоtеkli mеsеc
0
0
prоvеrеnо 03.05.2024.
Google ScholarTM
Prоvеritе
Аlt mеtrikа
Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.