Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19096
Nаziv: A comparative study of the decolorization capacity of the solar-assisted Fenton process using ferrioxalate and Al,Fe-bentonite catalysts in a parabolic trough reactor
Аutоri: Pucar Gordana 
Prica Miljana 
Kerkez Djurdja 
Božo Dalmacija 
Kulić Aleksandra 
Tomašević Pilipović Dragana 
Bečelić-Tomin Milena 
Dаtum izdаvаnjа: 2018
Čаsоpis: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Sažetak: © 2018 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers In this work, the decolorization efficiency of Reactive Red 120 (RR120) synthetic solution using ferrioxalate (CuOFeB) and Al, Fe-bentonite (AlFeB) catalysts in the solar-assisted Fenton process was evaluated, as well as impact of H 2 O 2 photolysis on the process efficiency.The photo-Fenton oxidation of dye has been investigated using a concentrating solar parabolic reactor with constant solar radiation of 550 W/m 2 and 950 W/m 2 for spring and summer periods, respectively. Experimental data has proved that photolysis of hydrogen peroxide has an important role in the process of decolorization, achieving a decolorization efficiency over 80.78% at pH 7. Under the optimal reaction conditions, both catalysts showed a good stability in the processes with dye removal over 90%. The mineralization efficiency depends on the intensity of the solar radiation, wherein ∼50% was achieved under the higher solar intensity. Comparing reaction rate it is important to note that the larger specific surface area of AlFeB (155.83 m 2 /g) makes him a superior catalyst and thus solar-assisted Fenton process with this catalyst fast and efficient. Based on the decolorization rate constants, the examined processes can be placed in the following order: AlFeB (950 W/m 2 ) > AlFeB (550 W/m 2 ) > CuOFeB (950 W/m 2 ) > CuOFeB (550 W/m 2 ). These findings are confirmed on real effluent, whereby a greater degree of decolorization (91.89%) and mineralization (43%) has been achieved with AlFeB catalyst compared to CuOFeB (30.09% and 15%) during the process.
URI: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19096
ISSN: 1876-1070
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.08.015
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:PMF Publikacije/Publications

Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

11
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

50
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
10
Prоtеkli mеsеc
7
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.