Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе:
https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19011
Nаziv: | Field sampling methods for investigating forest-floor bryophytes: Microcoenose vs. random sampling | Аutоri: | Ilić Miloš Igić Ružica Ćuk Mirjana Vukov Dragana |
Dаtum izdаvаnjа: | 2018 | Čаsоpis: | Archives of Biological Sciences | Sažetak: | © 2018 by the Serbian Biological Society. Because of the high importance of bryophytes in forest ecosystems, it is necessary to develop standardized field sampling methodologies. The quadrat method is commonly used for bryophyte diversity and distribution pattern surveys. Quadrat size and the position of quadrats within the studied area have a significant influence on different analyses. The aim of the present study was to define the minimum quadrat size appropriate for sampling ground bryophytes in temperate beech forests, to compare two different field sampling methods for research on ground bryophytes, the random and microcoenose methods; and to test the adequacy of the microcoenose sampling method in temperate beech forests. Research was carried out on Fruška Gora mountain (Serbia) at four different sites. All sites contained temperate broadleaf forest vegetation, predominantly Fagus sylvatica, but also included various other tree species. Systematic sampling based on nested quadrats was used to determine the minimum sampling area. Random sampling was performed using 10 or 20 microplots (minimum area quadrat), randomly located within 10x10 m plots. Microcoenose sampling is a systematic sampling method based on the fact that every bryophyte fragment on the forest floor is a separate microcoenose. These methods were compared using the following criteria: species richness; Shannon's diversity index and evenness measure; coverage of dominant species, and the time needed for sampling. The microcoenose sampling method has proven to be highly applicable in temperate beech forests in terms of species richness and diversity, in contrast to random sampling, which was not suitable for bryophyte flora with a patchy distribution. | URI: | https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/19011 | ISSN: | 0354-4664 1821-4339 |
DOI: | 10.2298/ABS180422020I |
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа: | PMF Publikacije/Publications |
Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki
SCOPUSTM
Nаvоđеnjа
5
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.
Prеglеd/i stаnicа
21
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
8
8
Prоtеkli mеsеc
0
0
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.
Google ScholarTM
Prоvеritе
Аlt mеtrikа
Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.