Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1761
Nаziv: Serbian consensus of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: NeoPULSE
Аutоri: Lazar Popović 
Zorica Tomasević
Ljiljana Stamatović
Ivan Marković
Gorana Matovina-Brko 
Marko Buta
Andrija Golubović
Vladimir Selaković
Jasna Trifunović 
Zafir Mutrezani
Nebojša Ivanović
Jasmina Nedović
Srđan Ninković 
Slađana Filipović
Ana Cvetanović
Nebojša Đorđević
Aleksandar Karanikolić
Tatjana Ivković Kapicl 
Ferenc Vicko 
Ključnе rеči: breast cancer;local practice;multidisciplinary team;neoadjuvant therapy;pathological complete response
Dаtum izdаvаnjа: 1-мар-2018
Čаsоpis: Journal of B.U.ON.
Sažetak: © 2017 Zerbinis Publications. All rights reserved. Even though surgery is the primary treatment of operable breast cancer, it has been known for decades that the administration of postoperative adjuvant or preoperative neoadjuvant therapy is extremely important. Indications for neodjuvant therapy administration have been expanded over the years, and nowadays this kind of treatment represents an inevitable option in early breast cancer treatment. The NeoPULSE project, which gathered a group of experts in the field of breast cancer from five Serbian university centres, was formed with the aim to define optimal breast cancer diagnosis, indications for neoadjuvant therapy, therapeutic combinations in relation to molecular/biological parameters of breast cancer, as well as the treatment after neoadjuvant therapy. During two separate expert meetings involving surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, a pathologist, and a "Blueprint" workshop, the project participants answered questions over the indications for neoadjuvant therapy. The first part covered local practice and referred to the existence and work of a multidisciplinary team, as well as commonly applied therapeutic regimens in the neoadjuvant setting. Experts analysed personal views regarding indications for the administration and benefits of neoadjuvant therapy, their perception on the correlation between achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) and the outcome of treatment, as well as the attitude towards controversies about this type of treatment, primarily regarding a possible change in the receptor status after therapy and therapeutic options after a suboptimal response. The analysis of the answers pointed to problems and deviations from recommendations in everyday clinical practice, based on which appropriate solutions were proposed. The establishment of such a panel and consensus is an attempt to modernize multidisciplinary teams in Serbia, achieve reaching uniform decisions of all subjects dealing with breast cancer, and therefore, at least in one segment, improve breast cancer treatment in Serbia.
URI: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1761
ISSN: 11070625
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:MDF Publikacije/Publications

Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

2
prоvеrеnо 20.11.2023.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

42
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
16
Prоtеkli mеsеc
6
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.