Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе:
https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12610
Nаziv: | Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management | Аutоri: | Srđević, Bojan | Dаtum izdаvаnjа: | 1-јан-2007 | Čаsоpis: | Decision Support Systems | Sažetak: | The social choice (SC) theory is in close relation with multicriteria decision-making (MCDM), especially in group decision contexts. SC theory includes various voting systems while MCDM is represented by utility and outranking methods; among utility models, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is probably the most popular in group decision support. In this paper, we investigate two possible contexts in modeling decentralized decision problems in water management. The first is based on AHP only and two group aggregation techniques. The second one assumes the AHP application in subgroups, while at a group level, aggregation is performed by the SC voting procedures. Comparative analyses show good agreement of the results when two methodologies are applied as the decision support to the water committee of the San Francisco river basin in Brazil. The second methodology (called AHP + SC) is considered more promising for implementation in real-decision situations in water management. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | URI: | https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12610 | ISSN: | 01679236 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.dss.2006.08.001 |
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа: | POLJF Publikacije/Publications |
Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki
SCOPUSTM
Nаvоđеnjа
159
prоvеrеnо 12.08.2023.
Prеglеd/i stаnicа
16
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
10
10
Prоtеkli mеsеc
0
0
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.
Google ScholarTM
Prоvеritе
Аlt mеtrikа
Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.