Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12243
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTatjana Brkanićen_US
dc.contributor.authorIvana Stojšinen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarolina Vukojeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSlavoljub Živkovićen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-03T14:47:43Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-03T14:47:43Z-
dc.date.issued2010-12-01-
dc.identifier.issn3708179en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/12243-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Root canal preparation is the most important phase of endodontic procedure and it consists of adequate canal space cleaning and shaping. In recent years, rotary instruments and techniques have gained importance because of the great efficacy, speed and safety of the preparation procedure. Objective: The aim of this research was to investigate the influence of different NiTi files on the canal wall cleaning quality, residual dentine debris and smear layer. Methods: The research was conducted on extracted human teeth in vitro conditions. Teeth were divided in 7 main groups depending on the kind of instruments used for root canal preparation: ProTaper, GT, ProFile, K-3, FlexMaster, hand ProTaper and hand GT. Root canal preparation was accomplished by crown-down technique. Prepared samples were assessed on scanning electron microscopy JEOL, JSM-6460 LV. The evaluation of dentine debris was done with 500x magnification, and the evaluation of smear layer with 1,000 times magnification. Quantitive asessment of dentine debris and smear layer was done according to the criteria of Hulsmann. Results: The least amount of debris and smear layer has been found in canals shaped with ProFile instruments, and the largest amount in canals shaped with FlexMaster instruments. Canal cleaning efficacy of hand GT and ProTaper files has been similar to cleaning efficacy of rotary NiTi files. Statistic analysis has shown a significant difference in amount of dentine debris and smear layer on the canal walls between sample groups shaped with different instruments. Conclusion: Completely clean canals have not been found in any tested group of instruments. The largest amount of debris and smear layer has been found in the apical third of all canals. The design and the type of endodontic instruments influence the efficacy of the canal cleaning.en_US
dc.language.isosren_US
dc.relation.ispartofSrpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvoen_US
dc.subjectroot canal preparationen_US
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopyen_US
dc.subjectsmear layeren_US
dc.subjectnickelen_US
dc.subjectpreparacija kanala korena zubaen_US
dc.subjectskening-elektronska mikroskopija (SEM)en_US
dc.subjectrazmazni slojen_US
dc.subjectniklen_US
dc.subjecttitanijumen_US
dc.subjecttitaniumen_US
dc.titleScanning electron microscopy investigation of canal cleaning after canal preparation with nickel titanium filesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/SARH1010551B-
dc.identifier.pmid138-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79951658837-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/79951658837-
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.relation.lastpage556en_US
dc.relation.firstpage551en_US
dc.relation.issue9-10en_US
dc.relation.volume138en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptMedicinski fakultet, Katedra za stomatologiju-
crisitem.author.deptMedicinski fakultet, Katedra za stomatologiju-
crisitem.author.parentorgMedicinski fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgMedicinski fakultet-
Appears in Collections:MDF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on May 10, 2024

Page view(s)

33
Last Week
9
Last month
0
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.