Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/11657
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Milićević, Dragan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jurić, Verica | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stefanović, Srđan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Baltić, Tatjana | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jankov, Saša | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-03T14:45:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-03T14:45:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-05-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 00904341 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/11657 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Two different analytical methods for the determination and confirmation of ochratoxin A (OTA) in blood serum, kidney, and liver of pigs have been compared. Sample cleanup was based on liquid-liquid phase extraction. The detection of OTA was accomplished with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) combined either with fluorescence detection (FLD) or electrospray ionization (ESI+) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The comparative method of evaluation was based on the investigation of 90 samples of blood serum, kidney, and liver per animal originating from different regions of Serbia. The analytical results are discussed in view of the respective method validation data and the corresponding experimental protocols. In general, analytical data obtained with liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS detection offered comparable good results in the sub-ppb concentration level indicating that the electrospray tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method was more selective and sensitive for the analysis and confirmation of OTA in pig tissues than the HPLC method after the methylation of OTA. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology | en |
dc.title | Evaluation and validation of two chromatographic methods (HPLC-Fluorescence and LC-MS/MS) for the determination and confirmation of ochratoxin A in pig tissues | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00244-009-9436-2 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-77952096206 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/77952096206 | - |
dc.description.version | Unknown | en_US |
dc.relation.lastpage | 1081 | en |
dc.relation.firstpage | 1074 | en |
dc.relation.issue | 4 | en |
dc.relation.volume | 58 | en |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
Appears in Collections: | POLJF Publikacije/Publications |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
15
checked on Mar 15, 2024
Page view(s)
34
Last Week
10
10
Last month
0
0
checked on May 3, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.