Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/11333
Nаziv: Computers in mathematical research: the study of three-point root-finding methods
Аutоri: Petković, Ivana 
Herceg Ð.
Dаtum izdаvаnjа: 1-јан-2019
Čаsоpis: Numerical Algorithms
Sažetak: © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. This paper is motivated by results of extensive comparative study of three-point methods for solving nonlinear equations presented in the paper (C. Chun, B. Neta, Comparative study of eighth-order methods for finding simple roots of nonlinear equations, Numer. Algor. 74, 1169–1201, 2017). In the first part, we show that the best ranking method, constructed by Sharma and Arora in 2016, is actually a special case of the family of three-point methods presented in the paper (J. Džunić, M. S. Petković, L. D. Petković, A family of optimal three-point methods for solving nonlinear equations using two parametric functions, Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 7612–7619, 2011). Since the mentioned Chun-Neta’s comparative study was carried out by testing algebraic polynomials of low degree (not higher than 6), in the second part we have extended comparative study to higher-order polynomials, polynomials with random coefficients, and polynomials with clusters of zeros. The performed experiments confirmed results of Chun and Neta. As in the cited paper of Chun and Neta, we have also applied the quality study based on computer visualization plotting the basins of attraction.
URI: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/11333
ISSN: 10171398
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-019-00796-6
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:PEF Publikacije/Publications

Prikаzаti cеlоkupаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

5
prоvеrеnо 06.05.2023.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

36
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
9
Prоtеkli mеsеc
0
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.