Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/9343
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHromiš (Krkić), Nevenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLazić, Veraen_US
dc.contributor.authorŠuput (Pejić), Danijelaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T09:15:14Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-30T09:15:14Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn14507188en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/9343-
dc.description.abstractWhen deciding what packaging is the most appropriate for a product there are many factors to be considered. One of them is the impact of the packaging on environment. In this work, life cycle inventory and life cycle assessment of two different volume packagings were compared. The data were collected on the types and amounts of materials and energy consumption in the process of packaging and distribution of hand cream packed in polypropylene jars of 200 and 350 mL. Life cycle inventory (LCI) and life cycle impact assessment (LCA) were calculated. It was found that the total mass flow was higher for the jars of 350 mL. After analyzing individual flows, it was found that in both cycles (polypropylene jars of 200 and 350 mL),the consumption of fresh water was a dominant flow. This fresh water flow is mostly (95%) consumed in the injection molding process of manufacturing jars from polypropylene granules. The LCA analysis showed no significant difference in global warming potential between different volume jars. The process that mostly affected global warming was the production of polypropylene jars from polypropylene granules by injection molding for both jar volumes. Judging by the global warming potential, there is no difference of the environmental impact between investigated jars, but considering the mass flow and water consumption, more environmental friendly were the 200 mL jars.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNovi Sad: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technology, Novi Saden_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Periodica Technologicaen_US
dc.titleComparison of life cycle assessment for different volume polypropylene jarsen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/APT1243159K-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84873602019-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84873602019-
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.relation.lastpage167en_US
dc.relation.firstpage159en_US
dc.relation.volume43en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptTehnološki fakultet, Katedra za inženjerstvo konzervirane hrane-
crisitem.author.deptTehnološki fakultet, Katedra za inženjerstvo konzervirane hrane-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9382-3409-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2751-7013-
crisitem.author.parentorgTehnološki fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgTehnološki fakultet-
Appears in Collections:TF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
Last Week
6
Last month
10
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.