Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/9243
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPopov, Borisen_US
dc.contributor.authorPopov, Stanislavaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T09:14:30Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-30T09:14:30Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-01-
dc.identifier.issn08949085en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/9243-
dc.description.abstractTesting of REBT theory in the work environment is a relatively new research domain, with few promising studies, especially in the context of occupational stress. The aim of this study is to explore the role that irrational and rational beliefs play, as factors of cognitive appraisal, in the development of some of the occupational stress indicators, as well as possible interaction between stressful working conditions and irrational beliefs. A sample of 221 Serbian employees, mostly from the private and public sectors, participated in this study. The results of the hierarchical regression analyses indicate that irrational beliefs make an independent contribution to the prediction of distress and burnout, although that contribution is less prominent than that of stressors. Rational beliefs significantly predicted distress, but not work burnout. Finally, no significant interactions were found between stressors and IB/RB. It can be concluded that (ir)rational beliefs play a significant role in distress and burnout prediction, but no support for a diathesis-stress model of cognitive vulnerability to occupational stress has been found in the present study. The results will be discussed in the context of REBT theory and practice. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.en
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Rational - Emotive and Cognitive - Behavior Therapyen
dc.titleAdverse Working Conditions, Job Insecurity and Occupational Stress: The Role of (Ir)rational Beliefsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10942-012-0157-5-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84874018878-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84874018878-
dc.description.versionUnknownen_US
dc.relation.lastpage38en
dc.relation.firstpage27en
dc.relation.issue1en
dc.relation.volume31en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptFilozofski fakultet, Odsek za psihologiju-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7124-6863-
crisitem.author.parentorgFilozofski fakultet-
Appears in Collections:FF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on May 10, 2024

Page view(s)

18
Last Week
9
Last month
0
checked on May 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.