Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8436
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHill A.en
dc.contributor.authorHorigan V.en
dc.contributor.authorClarke K.en
dc.contributor.authorDewé T.en
dc.contributor.authorStärk K.en
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien S.en
dc.contributor.authorBunčić, Aleksandaren
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T09:08:41Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-30T09:08:41Z-
dc.date.issued2014-04-01en
dc.identifier.issn09567135en
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8436-
dc.description.abstractThe UK Food Standards Agency is currently funding research to build the evidence base for the modernisation of meat inspection. This includes an assessment of the risks to public health and animal health/welfare of moving to a visual-only post-mortem meat inspection (PMMI), where routine mandatory palpation and incision procedures are omitted. In this paper we present the results of a risk assessment for a change from current to visual-only PMMI for cattle, sheep/goats and farmed/wild deer.A large list of hazard/species pairings were assessed and prioritised by a process of hazard identification. Twelve hazard/species pairings were selected for full consideration within the final risk assessment. The results of the public health risk assessment indicated that all hazard/species pairings were Negligible with the exception of Cysticercus bovis in cattle, which was judged to be of low-medium increased risk for systems not conforming to criteria as laid down by EC Regulation 1244/2007, compared to systems that do conform to Regulations for visual-only PMMI.Most hazard/species pairings were concluded to pose a potential increased risk to animal health/welfare, including Mycobacterium bovis (very low - low increase in risk, but with considerable uncertainty), Fasciola hepatica (negligible - very low) and Cysticercus bovis (very low - low). Due to low feedback rates to farmers, the real risk to animal health/welfare for F.hepatica and C.bovis, including animals in non-conforming systems under visual-only PMMI, is probably negligible. That then leaves M.bovis as the only confirmed non-negligible animal health and welfare risk. © 2013.en
dc.relation.ispartofFood Controlen
dc.titleA qualitative risk assessment for visual-only post-mortem meat inspection of cattle, sheep, goats and farmed/wild deeren
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.10.002en
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84887014492en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84887014492en
dc.relation.lastpage103en
dc.relation.firstpage96en
dc.relation.issue1en
dc.relation.volume38en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Naučne i umetničke publikacije
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

32
checked on May 10, 2024

Page view(s)

31
Last Week
8
Last month
0
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.