Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8208
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBogoljub Mihajlovićen_US
dc.contributor.authorJadranka Dejanovićen_US
dc.contributor.authorBojan Mihajlovićen_US
dc.contributor.authorDušan Popovićen_US
dc.contributor.authorMilica Panićen_US
dc.contributor.authorIlija Bjeljacen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T09:07:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-30T09:07:16Z-
dc.date.issued2013-01-01-
dc.identifier.issn258105en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/8208-
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic value, sensitivity and specificity of both the logistic and additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (as well as the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II and to assess the necessity for developing a local outcome prediction model in cardiac surgery.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The research included 406 consecutive patients who had undergone cardiac surgical procedures at Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina from January 2012 to July 2012. The authors compared the predicted mortality according to the additive and logistic European Systems for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, the new European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II and the observed mortality (30 days after surgery).RESULTS: The difference between the predicted and observed mortality regarding the whole group of 406 operated cardiac patients was not statistically significant for the additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (p = 0.081) and the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (p = 0.164), but it was statistically significant for the logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (p = 0.031). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves are statistically different from 0.5 for both models (additive and logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation), as well as for the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II. However, the proper classification of the patients has not been observed since their sensitivity and specificity are not satisfactory.CONCLUSION: The additive and logistic European Systems for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation overestimate while the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II underestimates the risk in cardiac surgery. We believe that a locally derived model would be of great use in the everyday clinical practice since it would faithfully illustrate the actual state of patient population of the region where it was developed. At the same time it would provide the accurate prediction of surgical outcome.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicinski pregleden_US
dc.subjectRisk Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectCardiac Surgical Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Testsen_US
dc.subjectAdverse effectsen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.titleVojvodinascore--local system for cardiac operative risk evaluationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.pmid66-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84891374799-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84891374799-
dc.description.versionPublisheden_US
dc.relation.lastpage144en_US
dc.relation.firstpage139en_US
dc.relation.issue3-4en_US
dc.relation.volume66en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptMedicinski fakultet, Katedra za urgentnu medicinu-
crisitem.author.parentorgMedicinski fakultet-
Appears in Collections:MDF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

22
Last Week
7
Last month
0
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.