Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5916
Pоljе DC-аVrеdnоstЈеzik
dc.contributor.authorJovanović, Veljkoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T08:51:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-30T08:51:13Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-01-
dc.identifier.issn01918869en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5916-
dc.description.abstract© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. The present research has aimed to extend the previous research on the structure of subjective well-being (SWB) by applying the bifactor model. The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) were administered to two large samples of Serbian young adults (N<inf>1</inf>=1669, N<inf>2</inf>=1522). The bifactor model of SWB with one general and three specific factors (life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect) provided the best fit to the data and outperformed the original three-factor model and the higher-factor model in both samples. The results supported the multidimensional nature of SWB, with a strong general factor underlying the SWLS and PANAS. Bifactor modeling has shown that SWLS and PANAS reflect both common and specific variance in SWB, with about half of the reliable variance in life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect being independent of the general factor. The present findings imply that researchers should be careful when interpreting SWLS and PANAS scores and that general SWB factor should be taken into account. Implications for scale scoring and interpretation, and theoretical conceptualization of SWB are discussed.en
dc.relation.ispartofPersonality and Individual Differencesen
dc.titleA bifactor model of subjective well-being: A re-examination of the structure of subjective well-beingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.026-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84938079576-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84938079576-
dc.description.versionUnknownen_US
dc.relation.lastpage49en
dc.relation.firstpage45en
dc.relation.volume87en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptOdsek za psihologiju-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9248-2518-
crisitem.author.parentorgFilozofski fakultet-
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:FF Publikacije/Publications
Prikаzаti јеdnоstаvаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

35
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

18
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
12
Prоtеkli mеsеc
0
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.