Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/441
Pоljе DC-аVrеdnоstЈеzik
dc.contributor.authorStanić, Goranen_US
dc.contributor.authorNikolov, Jovanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTucaković, Ivanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMrđa, Dušanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTodorović, Natašaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGrahek, Željkoen_US
dc.contributor.authorCoha, Ivanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVraničar, Andrejen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T10:07:29Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T10:07:29Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-11-
dc.identifier.issn01689002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/441-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Elsevier B.V. The quantitative determination of radionuclides by gamma ray spectrometry requires a high accuracy of detection efficiency determination. Different software codes for efficiency determination are available. The aim of this work was to compare different methods and software used for efficiency calibration modeling and analyses. For that purpose, same samples of vegetation and soil of known activities were measured using HPGe detectors in two laboratories which are employing different software for mathematical efficiency calibrations and analyses, LabSOCS which is based on purely mathematical calculations and Angle which uses a semi-empirical approach. The codes were also tested on samples with unknown reference values (different geometries and matrices). The main advantages and disadvantages of both software were compared. Both Angle and LabSOCS gave comparable and consistent results for different detectors, matrices and geometries used. Deviations of the order of 10% or less obtained from the comparison of different sets of parameters are acceptable and imply that Angle and LabSOCS can be considered reliable for gamma ray detector efficiency calibrations. The main limitation of LabSOCS is in its inability to be used on newly installed detectors (factory characterization needed first), as for Angle the main drawback is in its demand for reference materials which can be costly as well as the need for plenty detector characteristics which are not always provided by the manufacturer.en
dc.relation.ispartofNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipmenten
dc.titleAngle vs. LabSOCS for HPGe efficiency calibrationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nima.2018.12.059-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059231802-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85059231802-
dc.description.versionUnknownen_US
dc.relation.lastpage87en
dc.relation.firstpage81en
dc.relation.volume920en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptPrirodno-matematički fakultet, Departman za fiziku-
crisitem.author.deptPrirodno-matematički fakultet, Departman za fiziku-
crisitem.author.deptPrirodno-matematički fakultet, Departman za fiziku-
crisitem.author.deptPrirodno-matematički fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgPrirodno-matematički fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgPrirodno-matematički fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgPrirodno-matematički fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniverzitet u Novom Sadu-
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:PMF Publikacije/Publications
Prikаzаti јеdnоstаvаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

6
prоvеrеnо 20.11.2023.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

71
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
12
Prоtеkli mеsеc
4
prоvеrеnо 10.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.