Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4393
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaayen R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMilin Petaren_US
dc.contributor.authorRamscar M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T10:33:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T10:33:54Z-
dc.date.issued2016-11-01-
dc.identifier.issn02687038en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4393-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Background: Frequency of occurrence is a strong predictor of lexical processing across modalities and experimental paradigms. However, frequency is part of a large set of collinear predictors including not only frequencies collected from different registers, but also a wide range of other lexical properties such as length, neighbourhood density, measures of valence, arousal, and dominance, semantic diversity, dispersion, age of acquisition, and measures grounded in discrimination learning. Aims: The aim of this study is to provide a critical examination of these variables, the sources on which they are based, the way they are calculated and evaluated, and their potential causal relations. Main Contribution: We show that age of acquisition ratings and subtitle frequencies constitute (reconstructed) genres that favour frequent use for very different subsets of words. As a consequence of the very different ways in which collinear variables profile as a function of genre, the fit between these variables and measures of lexical processing depends on both genre and task. A graphical model suggests that neither frequency nor age of acquisition are primary causal factors, but rather semantic and emotion measures as well as measures derived from discriminative learning. Conclusions: The methodological implication of these results is that when evaluating effects of lexical predictors on processing it is advisable to carefully consider what genres were used to obtain these predictors, and to consider the system of predictors and potential conditional independencies using graphical modelling.en
dc.relation.ispartofAphasiologyen
dc.titleFrequency in lexical processingen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02687038.2016.1147767-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84961216521-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84961216521-
dc.description.versionUnknownen_US
dc.relation.lastpage1220en
dc.relation.firstpage1174en
dc.relation.issue11en
dc.relation.volume30en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:FF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

83
checked on May 10, 2024

Page view(s)

13
Last Week
7
Last month
0
checked on May 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.