Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3716
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorĆirić M.en
dc.contributor.authorĆurčić Ž.en
dc.contributor.authorMirosavljević M.en
dc.contributor.authorJeromela A.en
dc.contributor.authorJaćimović, Goranen
dc.contributor.authorProdanov , Fedoren
dc.contributor.authorŽivanović, Slavkoen
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T10:29:34Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T10:29:34Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-01en
dc.identifier.issn05340012en
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3716-
dc.description.abstractSugar beet cultivars have different responses in various environments, such as different locations, years, mineral nutrition treatments or the combination of these factors, due to genotype × environment interaction. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) is one of the most commonly used multivariate methods for analysis and visualization of genotype × environment interaction data. The main goals of the present study were to (i) investigate the application of AMMI method in the analysis of genotype × fertilizer interaction in sugar beet, (ii) to assess genotype × fertilizer interaction, and (iii) to identify sugar beet cultivars with the most stable response and high yield performance across different mineral nutrition treatments. The trial with eight sugar beet cultivars was conducted in two successive growing seasons at Rimski šančevi, Serbia. The different levels of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium fertilizers (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha-1) and their combinations represented specific environments for testing genotype × fertilizer interaction. Results from the analysis of variance indicated that the fertilizer treatment, cultivars, and their interaction significantly affected root yield variation in both seasons. Results from our study suggest that AMMI model with two and three first IPCA axes were recommended in 2014 and 2015, respectively. According to AMMI 1 and AMMI 2 biplot, E14 and E15 were high yielding and among the most stable treatments in both years. Among high yielding genotypes in 2014, G4 and G8 stand out as the most stable, while in the following year G3 had the lowest interaction score. AMMI analysis enabled identification of specific associations between cultivars and different mineral nutrition treatments, which was important for adjustment of fertilizer management for each cultivar in order to achieve high root yield with decreased and more rational fertilizer doses.en
dc.relation.ispartofGenetikaen
dc.titleAssessment of sugar beet root yield by AMMI analysisen
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.2298/GENSR1702663Cen
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85033564666en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85033564666en
dc.relation.lastpage675en
dc.relation.firstpage663en
dc.relation.issue2en
dc.relation.volume49en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptPoljoprivredni fakultet, Departman za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7538-6006-
crisitem.author.parentorgPoljoprivredni fakultet-
Appears in Collections:POLJF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on May 10, 2024

Page view(s)

25
Last Week
2
Last month
2
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.