Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1166
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDinić Bojanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmederevac Snežanaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T10:13:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T10:13:59Z-
dc.date.issued2018-11-01-
dc.identifier.issn01918869en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1166-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Elsevier Ltd The aim of this research was to examine which components (affective, behavioral, or cognitive) of trait aggressiveness were included in aggressiveness/agreeableness scales from both psychobiological and psycholexical models. In Study 1, aggressiveness components were measured by the Aggression Questionnaire (AQ), and in Study 2 they were measured by expert estimations of the contribution of each component in aggressiveness/agreeableness items. The results showed that the scales from psychobiological models were mutually similar and captured a broader range of aggressiveness indicators, favoring the behavioral component. Scales from psycholexical models also captured, to a lesser extent, behavioral component in relation to the AQ. However, according to expert estimations, they captured aggressiveness components in a more balanced way, but favor the cognitive component compared to psychobiological models. We could conclude that different approaches in defining basic personality traits influenced which components and indicators would be covered by certain self-report measures.en
dc.relation.ispartofPersonality and Individual Differencesen
dc.titleWhen you say aggressiveness, what do you mean by that? Similarities and differences between aggressiveness/agreeableness scales from personality inventoriesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.028-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048993492-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85048993492-
dc.description.versionUnknownen_US
dc.relation.lastpage320en
dc.relation.firstpage314en
dc.relation.volume134en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptFilozofski fakultet-
crisitem.author.deptOdsek za psihologiju-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5492-2188-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3780-0576-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniverzitet u Novom Sadu-
crisitem.author.parentorgFilozofski fakultet-
Appears in Collections:FF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Mar 15, 2024

Page view(s)

61
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Mar 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.