Mоlimо vаs kоristitе оvај idеntifikаtоr zа citirаnjе ili оvај link dо оvе stаvkе: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1100
Pоljе DC-аVrеdnоstЈеzik
dc.contributor.authorFilipović, Sanjaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRadovanović, Mirjanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGolušin, Vladimiren_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T10:13:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T10:13:32Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-01-
dc.identifier.issn13640321en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1100-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Elsevier Ltd Although the issue of energy security stands high on the scale of the European Union's priorities, there has been no single accepted definition of energy security thus far. In light of the global economic crisis and political instability, the issue of energy security is directly linked to geopolitical and macroeconomic stability. This paper offers a new method of measuring energy security, which unlike the existing indicators of energy stability, in addition to economic and environmental indicators, also includes the political and social aspects within the composite indicator of country risk. The new Energy Security Index (ESI) is defined based on the application of Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Analysis of the values of a new ESI indicator shows that energy security is greatly influenced by GDP per capita, country risk, carbon intensity, energy intensity, final energy consumption per capita and electricity prices, while the least importance rests with the share of renewable sources in energy consumption and energy dependence. The values of the Index by country are stable over the entire observed period, but significant differences are noticeable between countries. The highest index values are reported in Luxembourg, Sweden, Finland and Denmark, and the lowest in Bulgaria, Romania, Estonia and Poland. With the aim of robustness check, the results of EU member states rankings were compared to country rankings based on the Energy Trilemma Index. Compared to country rankings based on the Energy Trilemma Index, three countries recorded the same rank (Denmark, Check Republic and Bulgaria), and the biggest deviation of 9 ranking position was reported by Luxembourg. The results of the research show that there is a statistically important difference in the value of energy security index between the observed groups of countries classified according to the level of macroeconomic stability.en
dc.relation.ispartofRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsen
dc.titleMacroeconomic and political aspects of energy security – Exploratory data analysisen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.058-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85053392084-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85053392084-
dc.description.versionUnknownen_US
dc.relation.lastpage435en
dc.relation.firstpage428en
dc.relation.volume97en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Nаlаzi sе u kоlеkciјаmа:PMF Publikacije/Publications
Prikаzаti јеdnоstаvаn zаpis stаvki

SCOPUSTM   
Nаvоđеnjа

25
prоvеrеnо 20.11.2023.

Prеglеd/i stаnicа

34
Prоtеklа nеdеljа
6
Prоtеkli mеsеc
0
prоvеrеnо 03.05.2024.

Google ScholarTM

Prоvеritе

Аlt mеtrikа


Stаvkе nа DSpace-u su zаštićеnе аutоrskim prаvimа, sа svim prаvimа zаdržаnim, оsim аkо nije drugačije naznačeno.