Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10597
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErić, Mirelaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoprivčić I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVučinić, Nikolaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRadić R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKrivokuća, Draganen_US
dc.contributor.authorLekšan I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSelthofer R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-03T14:40:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-03T14:40:25Z-
dc.date.issued2011-08-01-
dc.identifier.issn09301038en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://open.uns.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10597-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The incidence of left-handedness in the general population is between 8 and 15%. There is a presumption that the prevalence of palmaris longus muscle differ between right-handed and left-handed people. This prospective study was conducted to determine the prevalence of the palmaris longus in relation to the hand dominance. Methods: The study included 542 subjects (216 male and 326 female). They were initially tested to hand dominance and after that they were asked to do the standard test (Schaeffer's test) for the assessment of the palmaris longus tendon. If the tendon was not visualized or palpable, four additional tests (Thompson's test, Mishra's tests I and II, Pushpakumar's "two-finger sign" method) were done to confirm its absence. Results: Right hand dominance was recorded in 452 (83.4%) subjects while the left hand dominance was recorded in 90 (16.6%) subjects. In right-handed subjects, palmaris longus tendon was absent on the right side in 24 (5.3%) and on the left side in 50 (11.1%) cases. In left-handed subjects, it was absent on the right side in 18 (20%) and on the left side in 2 (2.2%) cases. These differences were statistically significant. Bilateral absence of palmaris longus tendon was similar in both examined groups (25.1% in the overall series, 24.3% in right-handed subjects, 28.9% in left-handed subjects). Conclusions: The results of our study show that a right-sided absence was more common in left-handed persons while the left-sided absence was more common in right-handed persons. Unilateral tendon absence was more common on the non-dominant hand. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.en
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical and Radiologic Anatomyen
dc.titlePrevalence of the palmaris longus in relation to the hand dominanceen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00276-010-0751-0-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80052044785-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/80052044785-
dc.description.versionUnknownen_US
dc.relation.lastpage484en
dc.relation.firstpage481en
dc.relation.issue6en
dc.relation.volume33en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptMedicinski fakultet, Katedra za anatomiju-
crisitem.author.deptMedicinski fakultet, Katedra za anatomiju-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9214-384X-
crisitem.author.parentorgMedicinski fakultet-
crisitem.author.parentorgMedicinski fakultet-
Appears in Collections:MDF Publikacije/Publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on Mar 15, 2024

Page view(s)

6
Last Week
5
Last month
0
checked on May 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.